RIPOSTE
by RIP RENSE |
|
Vote For
Granny
(Feb. 16, 2005)
I ran into mayoral candidate Antonio
Villaraigosa, which I think is pronounced roughly like Bela Lugosi, a couple weeks ago.
He and another guy were sitting in a nice car
in Little Tokyo, late on a cool Sunday afternoon, while a hot blonde female companion
scoped out a nearby restaurant. At least I think that's what she was doing. She had exited
the nice car, fulsome hair cascading over a white blouse, legs borrowed from Barbi,
carrying a clipboard.
This would be a political aide.
Anyhow, Little Anthony sat imperially
in the front seat, as he and his pal awaited some sort of beckoning from Blondie. Boy, was
he well dressed! I mean, that was a seriously stiff white collar on that shirt, and the
charcoal suit looked like it had grown around him. If his fingers weren't weighed down
with bling, I must have added that in memory.
As I walked by, Little Anthony looked up with
the half-smile of a star who expects recognition from a fan. I stared at him briefly as
though he were just another guy sitting in a car. Which, of course, he was. He knew that
game, too, and quickly averted his expectant gaze.
I don't care for Villaraigosa---he's
an obsequious "consensus builder" (read: unprincipled) and an even more
charismatic speaker than Mayor James Hahn. And I find especially odious all the
pronouncements of how he could become "the first Latino mayor of L.A." I don't
care if he's Latino or Latvian. It should be as irrelevant as the allegations that he
fooled around on his wife ten years ago. But these are the sorts of "issues"
that people seem to enjoy talking and writing about---certainly not problem-solving.
Funny thing is, I might end up voting for
Little Anthony. Especially if I have a couple of good stiff drinks before going into the
voting booth. But more on that later.
Meanwhile, let me handicap the
L.A. mayoral candidates for you, in brief:
Bernard Parks is a city councilman, like Little
Anthony, and former police chief selected largely because he is African-American. He seems
an earnest fellow, and cuts an elegant, lanky figure, with handsome strands of gray woven
into hair and moustache, and a pleasing baritone voice. These features, in fact, would
seem his greatest legacies as a police chief and councilman, and are his most apparent
assets as potential mayor.
Richard Alarcon is a career politician whose
name is pronounced "Ala-corn" by white TeeVee newsmannequins. He is a state
senator, whatever exactly that is, and he speaks with conviction about things all
candidates speak about: limiting campaign contributions from this or that group (in his
case, developers, which is a good idea and probably killed his candidacy from the get-go),
add more cops, and so on. I would vote for him on the basis of his excellent pencil-thin
moustache. I'd like a mayor with a pencil-thin moustache.
___________________________________________________________________
No matter which one of these supermen sets up shop in the Daily Planet
building downtown, nothing but nothing is going to change.
____________________________________________________________________
Bob Hertzberg is a chubby guy
from the Valley and a former Assembly Speaker, whatever exactly that is. I was exiled to
the Valley for a good many years, so I am predisposed against voting for him on that
basis. Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has been elected governor in a fit of mass
delusion, supports Bob, as does former L.A. Mayor Richard "Dog Boy" Riordan. (I
gave him that nickname because if you turn the sound off during his public statements, he
appears to bark.) These endorsements mean that Bob is in the pocket of people with lots
and lots of money who don't give a rat's ass about the quality of life in Los Angeles.
Which, of course, means he has a shot.
Mayor James Hahn looks the way formica and vinyl smell. He is as scintillating as a
smoggy day, as amorphous of personality as Los Angeles, so maybe he's a perfect mayoral
fit. Hahn has lately been "embroiled in scandal," a cliched phrase that always
makes me hungry, over various aides being investigated for doing strange things with
money. He claims to know nothing about it, and I'm pretty sure he doesn't. I don't think he knows
much about anything that goes on around him, or if he does, he is certainly not bothered
about it. Like Alarcon, he is the type of elected official who forever talks about more
cops, and limiting political contributions, and so-on. He recently gave a hundred grand to
all the neighborhood councils in town, which as near as I can tell, enables them to fix
twenty or thirty potholes each instead of having the city do it. Hahn badly wants to spend
the entire budgets of most small nations on remaking Los Angeles International Airport,
which was just remade a few years ago.
Now what I suggest you all do,
fellow voters, is write in someone. Your college roommate. Your dog. Usher. Your dear
departed granny. I'm serious. I figure that if enough people do not vote for any of these
guys, none of them will get elected, and chaos will ensue. I think chaos already runs the
city of L.A., and this would just make it apparent. Otherwise, no matter which one of
these supermen sets up shop in the Daily Planet building downtown, nothing but nothing is
going to change.
None of these public servants, you see, seem to
understand that the city is broken. Kaput. Defunct. Dead as I wish all cell phones were.
Developers have long been given free reign here to raze anything-and-everything that can
be replaced by something more remunerative. Neighborhoods are ground up from Monterey Park
to Sherman Oaks to West L.A. to Atwater Village, and rebuilt as giant condo hives and
homes that look like Turkish whorehouses. Godzilla could not do more damage.
This is nothing new, of course, and no
revelation. Everyone knows it's happening. And that's the funny thing. Everyone knows, but
no one does anything to stop it.
___________________________________________________________________
Then there is what is forgivingly called "traffic." Now the
word, "traffic," you see, connotes movement, but that is not the case in
L.A.. Several nights per week, streets simply roll over and die.
___________________________________________________________________
Then you have "south-central,"
as it is benignly known, and various other city neighborhoods on the news every night for
gang murders, "officer-involved shootings," and general futility. This ensues
decade after decade, yet you never hear of plans to seriously change anything. (Imagine if
all the developers currently bulldozing L.A.'s character gave one-tenth of their profits
to hard-luck schools.) All you ever hear are calls for "more cops," or current
Chief Bill Bratton's crackpot, trickle-down anti-crime theory: that if you stop grafitti,
you stop gang shootings.
Pardon me while I teach my pet monkey to sing.
Then there is what is forgivingly called
"traffic." Now the word, "traffic," you see, connotes movement, but
that is not the case in L.A.. Several nights per week, streets simply roll over and die.
It's not "a tough drive," as the TeeVee Trafficmannequins pregnantly
chant---it's no drive. Side streets are overrun with people gone utterly berserk, ignoring
stop signs, mowing down pedestrians, taking 50 mph shortcuts through blind alleys. In
order to eventually re-encounter a main drag that is as constipated as Dom DeLuise after
Thanksgiving. Freeways? An oxymoron, any time of day or night.
This is nothing new, of course, and no
revelation. Everyone knows it's happening. And that's the funny thing. Everyone knows, but
no one does anything to stop it.
Los Angeles has finally become
unlivable. Not difficult, not stressful---unlivable. I have the ulcer to prove it. You
drive two miles and without exception you narrowly escape two or three major accidents.
You are tailgated constantly. Cars roll through stop signs and dart in front of you if
there is the slightest chance they can do it without collision. No one stops for fire
engines or screaming cop cars anymore. SUV's pause mid-block without signal or emergency
flasher, while their occupants make phone calls, pluck eyelashes, adjust I-pods and thong
underpants. Signalling? Sure. People signal left and turn right, if they signal at all. If
you are a pedestrian, drivers nearly kill you, and then give you the finger because you
had the audacity to nearly turn them into murderers. . .
And the Dodgers have been kidnapped by grifters
who refuse to make the stadium earthquake-safe.
But back to Little Anthony. The
reason I said that I might, if sufficiently drunk, vote for the lightweight prettyboy
martinet is that he is only candidate talking about transportation. He claims that he
wants to complete the light-rail lines throughout the city, something that should have
been done during the Sam Yorty administration.
The chances of Villaraigosa being able to bring
this about are as great as Hahn break-dancing. The chances of this solving L.A.'s
congestion are as great as the mayor and city council declaring a moratorium on all
residential development. Which, of course, is the real cause of all the congestion.
Yes, I suspect that Little
Anthony is probably lying to get my vote. I figure that because he lost
endorsements from organized labor
and Riordan, which he had in the last election, he's just looking for an angle to grab
some headlines. But that doesn't make him any different from any other candidate.
Except, perhaps, your dear departed granny.
BACK TO PAGE ONE |