The Rip Post                                


WHICH WAY FOR THE BEATLES' APPLE CORPS?
Now that the mercenary, predictable CEO Jeff Jones is gone, what direction will the once-idealistic company take? Will the creative potential of The Beatles' archive at last be mined?

by Rip Rense
(Feb. 27, 2025)

         Apple Corps Ltd., founded by The Beatles in 1968 as a Utopian ideal where all artists would be welcome, has long since become like any other mighty corporation---mercenary and calculating. Creatively, imaginatively curating the Beatles' vast archive, and serving the interests of fans, has long taken a back seat to the three r’s of music industry exploitation: re-releases, remasters, and remixes.
         
As John Lennon used to sing, tongue only partly in cheek: Give me money, that's what I want. . .
          What, after all, was Apple thinking, reissuing U.S. mono versions of the first seven Beatles LPs for Christmas, 2024? (Six, really, as “The Beatles’ Story” is a documentary.) The cynical calculus: X-million fans would buy the re-cycled vinyl ($300 per box!), never mind that they probably already own the albums in multiple forms. It’s a guaranteed greenback gusher, cashing in on so-called “completist” mentality (read: obsessive-compulsive disorder) and, to a less extent, recent generations who consider LP’s to be “cool.”
         
All in all, a far cry from the company's original brief: to be innovative, original, give the fans value-for-money (a Beatles credo)---and to showcase artists in pop, jazz, classical, avant-garde music---whether they were well-known or nobodies. While it is fact that the company was founded to rescue The Beatles from massive British income tax, Apple was still a radically populist---not primarily profit-based---gambit.


   The original ad for Apple as it appeared in many newspapers in 1968.

          Yet with  the exception of the revelatory Peter Jackson-directed 2021 series, “The Beatles: Get Back,” all the Apple releases during the 17-year tenure of recently resigned Apple CEO Jeff Jones have served the coffers, less the craft. And “Get Back” was an accident. First-tier Beatles fan Jackson was hired for a different project, an interactive concept, never realized. He asked to take a stab at creating a new movie from the long-mothballed “Get Back” footage, and then cleverly talked (if not tricked) releasing company Disney into a nearly eight-hour cable series. (Disney, not understanding fan interest, later refused to add bonus footage to the DVD, resulting in disappointing sales.)
            The pre-Jones Apple era was inventive and promising, kicking off with the massive George Martin-produced Beatles Anthology in the mid-90’s, followed by the George Harrison-instigated “Yellow Submarine Soundtrack,” a CD of all songs from the movie issued for Christmas, 1999. This marked the first time that new mixes of Beatles songs were presented (done elegantly by Peter Cobbin, who subsequently was bumped aside by Martin's son, Giles.)
           (Apple had been dormant for decades after The Beatles' break-up in 1970, not reviving until the mid-90s for Anthology---a documentary film, book, and three double-CD releases of never-before issued outtakes, live performances, auditions, demos---all overseen by Paul McCartney, George Harrision, Ringo Starr, Yoko Ono (for Lennon's estate), and Martin.)
           


OUT: predictable CEO Jones.       IN? Creative "Fanboy" Jackson

            Next came a huge surprise to fans: the McCartney pet project, “Let it Be. . .Naked” (2003), an effort to, in Paul's mind, set right the "Let it Be" album which he considered to have been botched by Lennon-appointed producer Phil Spector (the McCartney take is far more cohesive and polished), followed by the wildly imaginative George/Giles Martin production, “The Beatles Love” (2006), a CD compendium of wizardly mash-ups of songs done for the (recently closed) Las Vegas Cirque du Soleil. "Love" holds up splendidly, a sparkling ride of clever song hybrids and surprise arrangements.
            Then Jones arrived.
            Boom.
            He came direct from the commercial monolith, Sony, in 2007, where he had been an executive vice-president, and for Beatles releases, that was creatively that. Commercial monolith-ism took over. Consider the Jones era projects:
            *The remastered CD’s of 2009 were welcome, long overdue, but ultimately just another way to sell the same albums again.
            *The incredibly expensive boxed set remixes of “Sgt. Pepper,” the “white album,” “Let it Be,” “Abbey Road,” the so-called red and blue compilations are sonically bigger, louder, more discrete---but are, in the end, the same songs sold over again (yes, plus grab-bags of outtakes.) They are also very much a mixed blessing: producer Giles Martin has extensively meddled with the original mixes, essentially replacing the work done so artfully (with comparatively limited technology) by. . .his own father, and The Beatles. Result: the souped-up Giles remixes can sound cluttered (see: “Day Tripper”). Tightness and dynamics of the rather miraculous original mixes have often been sacrificed to “kitchen sink” philosophy of giving voice to every plink and plunk. And then there is Giles’ mixing judgement, which, among other crimes, frequently renders Paul McCartney’s lyrical, carefully crafted bass lines---integral to song arrangements---as rumbly background (see "Revolution 1") as if they are merely part of the rhythm section. Gasp.
            *The “bonus” CD’s of outtakes and rehearsals included in those boxed sets, while they are treasures, have been presented in a jumble, as leftovers and curios, chosen subjectively, even capriciously, by Giles. In the case of the especially fascinating “white album” outtakes, he deliberately did not even mix them, with the flimsy justification of wanting fans to hear them as they were found. This was a huge missed opportunity (more about this later.)
             *The “Eight Days A Week” film/CD live project is simply an embarrassment. It started out well, intended to be a comprehensive, incisive look at exactly how The Beatles evolved from scruffs messing with guitars into a tight, compelling performing unit, including many rare performances. Great idea. But Jones scuttled it(!), instead hiring Ron Howard to put together a dull, predictable general audience documentary, with the would-be comprehensive live album reduced to “Eight Days a Week: Live at the Hollywood Bowl,” released in 2016. Neither movie nor film acknowledged the huge amount of surgery done on the music to make it more appealing to the current (streaming) demographic, which (Giles said) allegedly would not comprehend “original patina” glitches, pitchiness. Just shameful, all of it.  A wasted opportunity, an unabashed cash-in.
                *The Martin Scorcese-produced “Beatles ‘64” documentary, while pleasant enough viewing, contained no revelations, and covered familiar territory more authentically revealed in Albert and David Maysles’ documentary, “The First U.S. Visit.” In a word: redundant. What’s more, as reviews noted, there was a surplus of irrelevant talking-head interviews (Terence Trent D’Arby? Really?) that too often interrupted thrillingly restored (by Peter Jackson) live performances, and the inevitable cliched contextualizing with the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. A compendium of the restored live performances alone would have been preferable, and more valuable, historically.
            All of which is to say, again, is that the idea of creatively presenting the remaining music and footage in The Beatles’ archive was absolutely abandoned under Jones.

            How else to explain, for easy example, the downright miserly, token collection of bonus tracks in the remixed “Let it Be” boxed set and DVD? At minimum, there should have been: a CD cherry-picking all the best jams, outtakes, oldies, and complete song performances done during the sprawling mono “Get Back” sessions, and a DVD of complete studio performances of the principal songs from those sessions, including alternate takes and the “rooftop” performance. Jackson's now-celebrated breakthrough technology, which he dubbed MAL 9000 in honor of The Beatles' beloved road manager, the late Mal Evans, marked the first time in history that mono recordings could be broken into discrete tracks, and then remixed into stereo. This should have been employed throughout the "Let it Be" box, with first priority to create a performing version of the band playing Harrison’s solo anthem, “All Things Must Pass,” culled from rehearsal takes and Harrison’s own solo studio self-accompanied demo on his birthday in 1969. The one that got away during the sessions. But. . .
            Didn’t happen.
            This is nothing but neglect of history.
            Insult to injury: “Get Back” director Jackson, whose Beatles expertise is beyond challenge, urged Disney to issue a few more hours of material in the “Get Back” DVD, but to no avail---and Jones and Apple did not step in. The result: with no incentive for fans to see anything not available in the original streaming of the series, DVD sales submarined. 
            Translation: the imaginative presentation of Beatles music and film was mostly dismissed by Jones-era Apple as “fanboy” fare (Jackson’s amusing term) allegedly of interest only to original fans. Further translation: dumbed down for a mainstream buck. Yes, this is how commercial and corporate Apple---founded as an anti-corporate champion of new music---has become. If there is money in recycling albums that have been released many times before, hey, it’s a go.
            Which brings us to this question: what is of more value: hearing an additional guitar note or two, or clearer harmonies, in remixed songs (not to mention Giles Martin's egregiously unmixed outtakes)---or hearing unreleased and/or restored “new” Beatles music? Yes, new. The answer should be obvious. Yet Apple, one supposes, might be of the opinion that any “new” material---such as a MAL-realized Beatles version of “All Things Must Pass”---is of such potential publicity and monetary value in the future, that it should not be “wasted,” say, in a full album of such music.  
            This is all a tragic disservice to The Beatles and George Martin, who, after all, produced the most memorable body of popular music in history.
            But now, with Jones’s departure (rumor is that he was gently forced out), Apple now has a chance to reverse course and get back to the spirit of what was happening from the mid-90's under former Apple CEO Neil Aspinall. There is vast potential---something average listeners do not realize. Top priority, as stated above: a “Get Back” sessions album (and DVD) of alternate versions, jams, outtakes, oldies, studio and rooftop performances (including a fully realized “All Things Must Pass”).
            Following are many new Beatles projects that do not seem likely to occur under Apple’s leadership, unless Jackson or someone with his expertise and “fanboy” enthusiasm takes over.

The pre-Jones Apple era was very inventive and promising, starting with the massive George Martin-produced Anthology in the mid-90’s, followed by the George Harrison-instigated “Yellow Submarine Soundtrack,” a CD of all songs from the movie issued for Christmas, 1999.

            *Live at the Star-Club: Jackson is on the record as wanting to give this invaluable look at the early Beatles the MAL treatment. “I'd love to take the Star Club tapes, best quality, and use our machine to basically split them apart, and also. . .take an echoey, amateury recording in a club and make it sound like it was in a studio,” Jackson told Beatles author Robert Rodriguez in 2022. Is he working on it now? Unknown. But he---or someone---should be. Performed in Hamburg at one of the band’s former showcase clubs on or near Dec. 31, 1962, and released in various legally contested configurations over the years, 33 songs were recorded by the club’s manager, Adrian Barber, using a Grundig reel-to-reel and a single microphone. Despite the dicey sound quality and various Beatles poo-pooing the performance as half-hearted, the concert is tight, well done, great fun, and features Ringo just four months into his Beatles tenure. Said Jackson: “Can you somehow get this computer to transform the quality of the sound. . .from the room sound and make sound like it was recorded at Abbey Road or something? And the (sound) guy said yeah, it would take a little bit of doing, but in theory, it's possible.” If accomplished, this would instantly become the most historically important live Beatles recording (especially if the blistering Harrison-sung “Red Hot,” a 1955 hit by by Billy “the Kid” Emerson, is included.)
            *Radio: All 275 live in-studio mono recordings of 88 different songs broadcast on the BBC (including 36 songs never recorded for Beatles albums) are now fodder for multi-track MAL 9000 stereo. Will Apple and Universal re-release all the BBC material, remixed? It does not seem likely, but certainly those 36 songs never on the original albums would seem a natural project. Imagine hearing them close to, or indistinguishable from, studio presence, and it becomes tantamount to having three new early/mid-60’s Beatles albums. That’s a wow. Just hearing the tinny Lennon-McCartney rarity, “I’ll Be On My Way” improved to near-studio ambience would justify the project, in my view. Historical value: restoring the BBC broadcasts of live performances in early 1962 with Pete Best. They are: March 7, the Playhouse Theatre, Hulme, Manchester, with “Dream Baby” (Roy Orbison), “Memphis” (Chuck Berry), “Please Mr. Postman” (Motown), “Ask My Why” (Lennon-McCartney), the rarity, “A Picture of You” (originally by Joe Brown); and June 15, the Playhouse Theater, with “Ask Me Why,” the standard, “Besame Mucho,” and “A Picture of You.”
            The Escher Demos: Yes, these 27 songs written for what became the “white album” (19 made it), recorded in mono in 1968 at Harrison’s home in Escher, were finally released as part of the “white album” boxed set in 2018, thank goodness. Is it too fine a point to re-release them in MAL’ed multi-track stereo mixes?  Doing so would imbue them with big, full, detailed sound,  effectively a live acoustic Beatles performance, right in your living room. Wouldn’t it be preferable for this to be released in maximum quality, rather than a batch of mono tracks buried in a boxed set as a curio? This would amount to a brand-new Beatles album of invaluable import.
           
Demos: There are countless Beatles demos from the early days to the late. Some have cropped up on Giles Martin-produced boxed sets, and some on Anthology (and, of course, bootlegs), and they vary greatly in sound quality. Even without MAL, a comprehensive survey of the demos---always of charm and historical significance---is long overdue. MAL-“demixing” and remixing in state-of-the-art sonic enhancement would make such a collection an invaluable Beatles experience. Think: sketches for Van Gogh paintings. Perhaps there would be more revelations a la the Lennon demo for a plaintive ballad that morphed into “Yellow Submarine.” How about that early demo of "What Goes On?" that is so different from the Rubber Soul version? Maybe the legendary McCartney song, “Etcetera,” long in his possession, might make its debut, along with other discoveries. The many songs the band gave to other artists, from “Bad to Me” (Billy J. Kramer and the Dakotas) to “I’m in Love” (The Fourmost) to “World Without Love” (Peter and Gordon) to “Goodbye” (Mary Hopkin) to “Sour Milk Sea” (Jackie Lomax) are essential. Even parts of that home jam from 1960 (with Stu Sutcliffe fumbling around on bass on a couple numbers) might have a salvageable moment or two. And although they weren’t demos, strictly speaking, the Quarrymen’s 1958 make-your-own-record takes of “In Spite of All the Danger” and “That’ll Be The Day” could fit here. (Note: Jackson is on the record as wanting to MAL both.)
            *Other Live Concerts: Every mono live recording of the group on tour is now up for MAL grabs. All can now be de-mixed, multi-tracked and, uh, de-screamed---from Hollywood Bowl to Tokyo to Munich. This is not to say that all such concerts should be done. Perhaps a highlights---best of---package would be the way to go. Then there are more historically interesting possibilities: the Cavern Club rehearsals in ’62, shortly after Ringo joined (plus the filmed-for-TV “Some Other Guy” and “Kansas City”); the July ’62 Cavern Club complete performance (with Pete Best), reportedly owned by McCartney; the recently discovered hour-long 20-song set from Stowe (boys’) School in Buckhinghamshire April 4, 1963 (screamless---with genuine fans yelling out requests!); the July 7, 1957 Quarrymen performance where 15-year-old McCartney watched 16-year-old Lennon (and later was introduced to him, thank goodness).
            *Television: The better performances from the excellent “Blackpool Night Out” shows, the New Musical Express Pollwinners Concerts from 1964 and ’65, “Morecombe and Wise,” “Shindig,” “The Ed Sullivan Show,” “Ready Steady Go,” “Lucky Stars,” “Royal Variety Show,” “Drop In” (Sweden), the Washington Coliseum concert (perhaps the low-volume microphone problems can be fixed!). . .yes, all can now be MAL’ed and turned into multi-track stereo. It would be tough to choose highlights only; the sensational Washington show alone begs for full release.

            New Beatles songs:
What? Wasn’t “Now and Then” the last new Beatles song? Depends on how you define the term. In what Jackson likes to call “fan-boy stuff,” there are opportunities to create---yes, create---what can be described as new Beatles songs. No, this does not mean artificially imitating voices and instruments, perish the ridiculous thought. Two examples come to mind: using MAL to remove Harrison’s vocal from the demo for his terrific song, “Sour Milk Sea,” (given to old Liverpool crony Jackie Lomax, as one of Apple's first releases by new artists), enhancing it, and replacing the Jackie Lomax vocal. As is well known: Ringo, Paul, George, Eric Clapton, Nicky Hopkins are on the Lomax recording. Would this constitute a Beatles song? Not strictly speaking, but easily fits the bill in a “white album” sense, when there were guest musicians and not every Beatle on each track. Similarly, McCartney’s vocal on the demo for his wonderful, “Goodbye,” could replace Mary Hopkin’s in the official 1968 version, which features Paul on multi-instruments, and warm arrangement by Richard Hewson (who did “The Long and Winding Road” and “Across the Universe.”) Again, a “white album”-ish undertaking.
           *The Beatles Christmas Album
---Released to fans only as an Apple LP in 1970, this has, incredibly, never otherwise been officially issued. It contains all seven original messages sent to fans on flexi discs from 1963 to 1970. It should be supplemented with Christmas message outtakes, the six-minute goof, “Christmas Time is Here Again,” and why not throw in a new “Beatles” Christmas EP with McCartney’s “Wonderful Christmastime,” Lennon’s “Happy Xmas,” Harrison’s “Ding Dong, Ding Dong,” and something from Ringo’s terrific Christmas album, such as “I Want to Be Santa Claus.” Perhaps Paul and Ringo could be induced to write and sing a new contribution for the set. (Yes, all the flexis were reissued in a cynically priced $300 boxed set in 2017, but we’re talking about an album here.) This would make a mint, could be issued in affordable configurations, and make a hell of a lot of people happy.  
            *Alternate versions of albums---Releasing outtakes, rehearsals, embryonic takes of Beatles songs in a jumble, as has happened with every Giles Martin-remixed boxed set so far, is akin to discovering veins of gold and not turning them into gorgeous jewelry, art, or sculpture. There are, in some cases, full alternate albums to be created. What? Tampering with history? Yes. What do you think remixing is? To leave the riches left behind by The Beatles unmixed, unrestored, unreconstructed, is to leave diamonds uncut and unpolished. Why not have a completely alternate version, say, of “Revolver?” Just present it as such. Ditto for “Rubber Soul,” I suspect, and possibly others. Such ventures should consist only of sufficiently different finished versions of songs (the early take of “Tomorrow Never Knows,” for example, or “Yellow Submarine” with all the sound effects turned up), or they can be, yes, artificially realized (much as George Martin did with a “Strawberry Fields Forever” collage on “Anthology 2.”) For example, take the vibraphone instrumental backing for “I’m Only Sleeping” done by George Martin. Lennon passed on this treatment, but fans have looped it into a complete backing, and added the acoustic vocals (and guitars) from an early take. The result: a completely new and viable version of the song.
            *Alternate “white album.”---George Martin famously tried to persuade the band to put out one strong album, rather than a double. Well, this can still be done---but with very different versions of songs. Top of the list: restoring Lennon’s original “Revolution” (later “Revolution 1”), which evolved into about seven minutes of chaos and sound sculpture. This approximately 13-minute version was bootlegged some years back, but lacked Lennon’s lead guitar overdub and Martin’s brilliant horn arrangement, as well as several tapes of Beatles vocals earmarked for addition to the song. Why not restore it? That Giles Martin did not do this for the “white album” boxed set was shocking. It amounts to an entirely new Beatles work. Another “Revolution” candidate: a sizzling uptempo version (released on the “white album” outtakes discs) without the feedback on guitars, and vocals. Why not add vocals to it, especially the “shoo-be-doo-wops" (which really should have been on the original single.) Or just add them to the released single version. Also: “I’m So Tired” with the Harrison guitar fills restored, “Yer Blues” with the dual George and John guitar solos (properly mixed, unlike the Giles version), “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” (there is the acoustic version with George Martin orchestration, and  the outtake electric version---which could be made whole by simply adding the ending of the released version), and “Good Night,” the four-part harmony take with John accompanying on electric guitar. Further begging construction: the very different early (unnumbered) instrumental outtake of “Everybody’s Got Something to Hide Except for Me and My Monkey,” but with the vocals added for a finished version (fans have done this to great effect on Youtube.)

            *Abbey Road as originally envisioned---George Martin and Paul McCartney first wanted Abbey Road to be one huge suite of songs connected by band interludes and/or original orchestral music by Martin. It would effectively have been one gigantic symphonic medley, start to finish. Well. . .it still can be. Think: orchestral overture, and orchestral interlude between side one and two, with Beatles and/or Beatles-with-orchestra to fashion segues between song (a la the mash-ups on "The Beatles Love.") Why not do it? Symphonic Abbey Road. Highly skilled contemporary composers are everywhere. Hire one of them and put him or her to work with McCartney on how to frame the whole album, and how to link the songs. Of course, George Martin’s original orchestrations should be left intact---along with the medley on side two (a compromise reached with Lennon, who absurdly thought the whole-album suite concept to be pretentious.) George Martin's orchestrations, of course, could also be drawn upon (or stylistically imitated) for overture and between-track passages. Not to replace Abbey Road, but to create a fabulous alternate version.
            *Album(s) of best alternate versions---If full alternate albums seems too extreme, then why not a series of albums of the greatest alternate versions/outtakes/restorations as described above? Grouped chronologically, so as not to mix wildly different Beatles styles. Did such a thing ever remotely occur to Jeff Jones?
            *The Beatles Live (Film Project)---Revive the original concept of the film  project that tragically morphed into the bland “Eight Days a Week” film and the accompanying, heavily doctored Hollywood Bowl album. Restore raw footage and music to pristine condition with MAL 9000 under the supervision of Peter Jackson. DVD and CD. The original brief: chronicle the development of The Beatles from kids plinking guitars into a hot ensemble, documenting everything from The Quarrymen through the Pete Best-era Beatles to the jaded “old guys” on the Apple rooftop. Include never-before-released Cavern material owned by McCartney. No one could do this better than Jackson. Movie and boxed set.
            *Magical Mystery Tour film, Special Edition---Yes, the knock on this film is that it is wacky psychedelic slapdash indulgence, with flat spots. Doesn’t matter. It’s the Beatles. The only thing better than Beatles is more Beatles. Gather up all the outtakes, and there are many---all the cutting room floor material---especially the part in the diner where Auntie Jessie (Vaudeville veteran and actress Jessie Robins) plays the hell out of a drum kit with a jazz band, and sings (much to Ringo's delight.) Re-cut the movie to include this, and more, and also hire artists to make video sequences for additional songs not originally in the film: “Hello Goodbye” (use the various promo films as a basis), “Baby You’re a Rich Man,” “All You Need is Love” (the “Our World” live broadcast would fit nicely), “You Know My Name (Look Up The Number)” (mostly recorded in ’67.) Put Jackson in charge of this. (If the big race sequence is cut down a bit, in the process, it wouldn’t break any hearts!) Maybe have “old Ringo” and “old Paul” do cameos in their old wizard outfits. Hey, why not? This could be wonderful. Did Jeff Jones ever even think of this?


Why not an expanded special edition of "Magical Mystery Tour," with more footage and newly commissioned sequences for omitted songs such as "Hello Goodbye" and "Baby You're a Rich Man?"

             *"It’s All Too Much,” Special Edition---This epic Harrison anthem should have become a Beatles staple on par with “All You Need is Love,” but due to slipshod production (no George Martin present) and being “thrown away” on the original “Yellow Submarine” soundtrack album, it has never gotten its due arrangement or acclaim. This can be rectified today! The excellent missing verse and bridge must be restored, for starters, and a badly needed George Martin-esque orchestral backing could be composed by Giles Martin, McCartney, and Ben Foster (the team that composed the strings for “Now and Then.”) This would allow the song its full scope and breadth for the first time, and imbue it with a grandeur merited by its subject matter. What a fantastic tribute to Harrison this could be.
            And here are a couple of “fanboy fantasies:”
            *"You’ll Know What to Do”---Fanciful? Sure. The second original Harrison song written for The Beatles was found in a cupboard in George Martin’s home as a studio demo from 1964 with Harrison accompanying himself on electric guitar, and someone (probably Paul, given that Ringo was hospitalized with tonsillitis) shaking a tambourine. Well, The Beatles’ rhythm section still exists! Why not convene Paul and Ringo to add bass and drums to this good little tune? Harmony vocals? Why not invite Dhani and Julian (and/or Sean) to sing them? This would “do right by George,” and give the song full stature, rather than leaving it as a leftover, a curio. No, it's not The Beatles, but. . .why not?
           *"Bad to Me”---This Lennon-McCartney original exists only as a demo by John and Paul with acoustic guitars. With a MAL 9000 clean-up, it can be rendered close to studio quality. Give it the same treatment as the one proposed for “You’ll Know What to Do”---Ringo and Paul add the rhythm section, and invite Beatles offspring to do additional harmony vocals, if deemed desirable. Guitar solo? Let Paul play it. There are other early demos where this approach is possible, including McCartney’s “One and One is Two,” “I’m in Love.” And this, of course, along with “You’ll Know What To Do,” could all be part of an album or boxed set of. . .AI-upgraded Beatles demos.
            Whether one agrees with all of these suggestions or not, they demonstrate a creative, imaginative approach to The Beatles archive that has been exasperatingly absent under the mercenary Apple reign of Jones. If Apple's original Utopian premise can't be revived, at least its "value for money" integrity can be. Let it be hoped that Jones is not replaced with another corporate CEO whose priority is money, money, and also: money. Best candidate: Peter Jackson.


              Jackson

Rip Rense is a veteran journalist and author who has been writing about The Beatles since age 16. He is longtime contributing editor to Beatlefan magazine.

                                             BACK TO PAGE ONE

© 2024-25 Rip Rense. All rights reserved.